Since
starting my blog, I like to think I have made my views on dietary fat
pretty clear. If not, have a read here, here and here.
I've
hopefully corrected a few long held misconceptions and busted a few
myths along the way.
So,
I trust were are all now gaining the wonderful nutritional (and
performance) benefits of eating healthy (animal fats), drinking whole
milk, and passing on the vegetable oils, trans fats and processed
pseudo-foods.
I've
also questioned the long held belief in the importance of dietary
carbohydrate and even been so bold as to suggest that athletes need
not be quite so reliant upon them – certainly not to the
percentages advised by many mainstream sources. Indeed performance
can be vastly improved (particularly in events lasting over an hour)
by becoming LESS reliant on carbohydrate and (re)training our bodies
to be more efficient at burning fat - and to do that you gotta eat
it!
“Oh
but you can get away with eating so much fat because you train so
much – it doesn't apply to normal people!”
I
hear this all the time, and let me lay this one to rest.....
YOU...ARE...WRONG
The
reality is, if I trained less I'd eat MORE fat and even FEWER carbs.
My training allows me eat more CARBOHYDRATE, not more FAT!
So
what about protein?
So
far, this macro nutrient has flown below the radar on my blog but
today it gets it's 15 minutes of fame!
I'm
gonna opt to delicately side step the ethical debate around meat
consumption. I'm just going to assume that we all support the fact
that we NEED protein and accept that people have the freedom to
choose where that protein comes from. I respect ethical vegetarians
and vegans and think their motivations are very noble.
Personally,
I don't think the ethics of a vegetarian / vegan diet are quite so
clear cut and I consider it a privilege, not a right to eat meat. I
do so in a way which I view as ethical and sustainable as possible –
choosing, as I do, to eat meat (and animal products) from animals
which have lead as natural, and as happy a life as possible. Ok, not
quite side stepped, but I leave it there.
So
please, don't judge me for being a carnivore – I love animals
too....... I just wish they didn't taste so damn good (or were so
good for me).
I
am also going to avoid getting dragged into addressing the numerous
scare stories linking meat consumption to everything from cancer to
global warming. This is not the subject of this post and 5 minutes on
Google will highlight the massive flaws in ALL of these studies –
yes, every single one.
If
you are interested, here's another great blog that addresses the
shortcomings of these studies.
Suffice
it to say that any research grouping “red AND processed meat”
into a SINGLE food group, and not allowing for the ratios of other
macro nutrients being consumed, is not worth a second of your
valuable consideration. Grass Fed Rib Eye and Billy Bear Ham are
about as alike nutritionally as Jersey Butter and used Engine
oil...... or margarine.
Really NOT the same thing! |
No,
this post is more about Protein as a macro nutrient, what it does for
us, and critically how much we should consume and when. True to form,
I'll also be donning my myth busting pants as well!
So
queue the superhero music...... I need to find a phone booth!
So
What is Protein Exactly?
“Protein”
is often the catch all phrase used to describe a particular macro
nutrient we obtain from our diet. To be accurate, this is “Dietary
Protein” and we get it from many different sources in different
quantities and qualities (more later).
Contrary
to popular belief, humans do not use dietary protein directly. As an
example, If I eat a steak – the protein content does not go
straight to my muscles for repair like some sort of car body filler.
No,
as with most dietary science, it's a little more complex than that –
but brilliant in it's design.
Dietary
proteins (like all proteins) are biochemical compounds consisting of
one or more repeating chains of amino acids known as “polypeptides”
- this is important, because it's the amino acids which are critical!
There
are 22 amino acids which we need to worry about 13 of which we can
make or “synthesise” ourselves, 9 of which we cannot (10 for
children as they are unable synthesise the amino acid Arginine).
These 9 (10) amino are known as “essential amino acids”.
As
a side note – you'll often hear textbooks and some nutritionists /
dieticians speak of 20 amino acids and 8 essential amino acids.
Strictly
speaking there are another 2 (at least) “non-standard” amino
acids which are genetically encoded for humans, these are
Selenocysteine and Pyrrolysine – but I'm maybe splitting hairs.
20
or 22 - to fully understand this, you'd need to arm yourself with a
degree in biochemistry or read this article – be warned, this
article WILL make your brain hurt.
Thankfully,
the scientific minutia is not all that important. What IS important
is the notion that some protein sources (mostly animal based) contain
ALL the amino acids the human body needs, other sources DO NOT
(mostly plant based) and so must be combined to provide a “complete
protein”. A complete protein is one that provides at least the 9
(10) essential amino acids (in sufficient quantity) from which all
others can be synthesised.
Dietary
protein can therefore be viewed as a model made of Lego bricks. With
the individual bricks representing the individual amino acids.
Now,
I might want to build a Lego car – but my sister has just built a
little house for her dolls.
I
have absolutely no use for a dolls house. (In the same way I have no
direct use for a cows gluteus maximus)
No
bother, I can “break down” her dolls house (most probably
violently) and rebuild the Lego bricks into whatever I want – in
this case a car.
Providing
the model of the dolls house contains ALL the building bricks I need,
I can build whatever I want.
If
it doesn't, I may have to destroy the Lego fairy castle she's built
as well (Seriously, leave my god damn Lego alone!!)
So
this is exactly how the human body uses protein. We consume it in
what ever form we fancy, we break it down into individual amino acids
and “re-build” them into whichever proteins WE as humans need –
Providing the original dietary protein source contains all the
“building blocks” or amino acids we require.
This
ladies and gents is “Protein Synthesis” - pretty neat eh?
So
hopefully you can see, if you are consuming incomplete proteins due
to a poor diet (I'm not saying vegetarian or vegan – but these
diets DO make it harder to consume complete proteins), then you will
not be able to synthesise the various proteins your body requires.
Like the child with only a modest supply of Lego bricks who can only
build lame stuff like aeroplanes with only one wing rather than cool
stuff like spaceships!
So,
lucky for those of us who consume animal products, meat, fish,
poultry, cheese, eggs, yogurt, and milk as these are all fine sources
of complete protein.
Unlucky
for vegetarians and vegans most plant based foods are not. Even
sources which do contain all 9 (10) essential amino acids (like
Quinoa) they typically do not contain them in sufficient quantity to
be considered “complete”. The may have what is know as a
“limiting amino acid”.
Worse
still, the many meat replacement products which do provide complete
protein (soya products, Quorn etc) also have many negative health
consequences to boot. (I'll save that one for another day – the
vegans out there probably already hate me)
Of course, the vegetarian diet can be very healthy - it fact, in many ways it's much healthier than the typical Western diet. Vegetarians do actually seem to care what they eat at least!
The best way of providing enough high quality protein in the vegetarian diet is to include meat.... sorry I mean fish! Including fish (particularly oily varieties like mackerel) will also boost Omega 3 intake.
Vegans - seriously, best of luck, but I guess you'll be eating a whole lot of soya and beans / pulses / grains. Sadly these are not foods I would advise anybody to eat in large quantities if health is your ultimate goal. But each to their own.
Of course, the vegetarian diet can be very healthy - it fact, in many ways it's much healthier than the typical Western diet. Vegetarians do actually seem to care what they eat at least!
The best way of providing enough high quality protein in the vegetarian diet is to include meat.... sorry I mean fish! Including fish (particularly oily varieties like mackerel) will also boost Omega 3 intake.
Vegans - seriously, best of luck, but I guess you'll be eating a whole lot of soya and beans / pulses / grains. Sadly these are not foods I would advise anybody to eat in large quantities if health is your ultimate goal. But each to their own.
Bottom line, if you don't eat animal products, you need to be very vigilant in
obtaining your protein from a wide variety of different sources,
ideally at every meal.
What
does Protein do exactly?
“It
helps us grow, build and repair muscle” is a fairly standard
response but only represents a tiny fraction of what Protein does.
The
importance of Protein is best summarised by saying it participates in
virtually every process within cells. To this end we should not
consider protein as a single compound but more as a number of many
different compounds each one dedicated to performing different roles
within the body.
So,
from our supply of amino acids (derived from dietary protein) we are
able to synthesise our own proteins for whatever role may be
required.
These
roles include....
Defence
Certain
proteins, in the form of antibodies, provide defence by immobilizing
foreign invaders so white blood cells can destroy them.
Muscle Contraction
The
proteins Actin and Myosin are involved in muscle contraction and
movement.
Biochemical Catalysts
These
proteins facilitate and / or speed up chemical reactions within the
body. For example, Lactase breaks down the sugar found in milk.
Hormones
Some
proteins serve as chemical messengers to help to coordinate certain
bodily functions and activities. You'll all have heard of one...”Insulin”
is a hormone protein which regulates glucose metabolism. Another
important ones for athletes is is Somatotropin, a growth hormone
which stimulates protein production in muscle cells.
Structure
These
proteins include Keratin, Collagen and Elastin. They are fibrous and
stringy and provide support and strength for hair, nails, tendons and
ligaments.
Storage
These
proteins store amino acids allowing our bodies to draw on them as
required to synthesise other proteins. This includes a protein you've
probably heard of – casein (milk protein).
Transport
Carrier
proteins move molecules around the body. An important example is
hemoglobin which transports oxygen through the blood.
So
protein is NOT just the preserve of athletes, gym junkies or
body-builders. I'd strongly recommend including it in the diet of
anybody who enjoys being alive!
So
how much do we need?
Tricky ones this.
We could ask, “Well
how much can I actually use?”
To which the answer
would be – “It depends on how much you need!”
So kind of a catch 22
and there is the problem. Protein requirement varies from person to
person based on genetics, gender, size, age, activity and stress
levels, training goals etc.
You'll hear anything
from 0.8g – 2.0g of protein per Kg of body weight.
The needs of a small,
sedentary female, will differ from those of a large male engaged in heavy
strength training which in turn differ from the needs of the elderly.
In this sense – if
the body needs it, it'll pretty much take what you can give it!
(within reason)
This needs some
nuancing though.
I'm sure many of you
have heard the proposition that we can only “absorb” 20-30g of
dietary protein in one sitting. If a anybody tells you this they
fundamentally misunderstand how protein is assimilated by the human
body. As dogmas go, it ranks right up there with myths like
“Saturated fat clogs your arteries”, “High Cholesterol causes
heart disease” and “Athletes need to base their diet on 60%
carbohydrate”.
Before we look at the
science, lets consider this notion from a logical, evolutionary
perspective.
Imagine if you will one
of our Palaeolithic ancestors. Now, it is generally agreed that
“paleo man” ate a heavily animal based diet – up to 65% total
calories in fact (with the rest coming from plants).
So it can be taken as a
given that our ancestors would have consumed a fair amount of dietary
protein and fat (also less total carbohydrate, definitely MUCH LESS
sugar and definitely ZERO “Weight-watchers “ lasagne).
See here: Hunter Gatherer Diets
Also, before the
benefits of shops and refrigeration or other means of preservation,
food would have been consumed more sporadically, eaten as and when it
was available, most likely during large single feeds and interspersed
with periods of enforced fasting. The human body evolved to operate
in this way, as did those of most other animals. Indeed, intermittent
fasting or “IF” has a large following amongst those looking to
maximise health and longevity.
It would seem a pretty
serious flaw in the human design if, having taken a number of days to
bag a decent meal our paleo ancestor would only be able to make use
of a mere 30g of dietary protein it contained?
I'm guessing a fully
grown active caveman could need (conservatively) around 100-150g of
protein per day. So the lousy 30g “hit” from his meal would see
him becoming quickly protein deficient and pretty quickly dead –
along with the rest of his species.
No,
luckily for us the human body is far more elegant than that. Larger,
protein rich meals (which are also likely to also contain significant
amounts of dietary fat) will take longer to digest.
This
is key, we don't eat pure protein or amino acids (unless we
supplement) – we eat REAL food!
Also,
the presence of protein in the duodenum causes the secretion of
the peptide hormone Cholecystokinin which slows the
intestinal contractions – giving yet more time for amino acids to
be absorbed. Hey, it's almost like the body actually knows what it's doing and isn't deliberately trying to kill us!
So
yes, while it may take time, ALL the protein you eat WILL be broken
down into amino acids and absorbed. Remember, absorption only refers
to nutrient uptake via the digestive tract and the fact is, our bodies have a very
large capacity for amino acid absorption. Now amino acid UTILIZATION
is a different story and this is probably where a lot of the
miss-information comes from.
As
I've explained amino acids serve many different roles within the
body. But what about the specific benefits to athletes and sports
people?
Muscle
building
For
endurance athletes this doesn't mean getting huge biceps and pecs
(sorry). Genetics and body type will largely dictate if you are
likely to “bulk-up” with training and diet – even if you lift
big weights (which you should) - Natural endurance athletes
(ectomorphs) are less likely to bulk up than naturally bigger people
(meso and endomorphs). However – this doesn't mean endurance
athletes can't build lean muscle and get very lean and very powerful
– because we can!
So
for endurance athletes combining protein with training is about
building new, lean muscle mass, losing excess body fat and
increasing our strength and power to weight ratio.
Oi fatty! |
Exercise
adaptation
This
means becoming stronger or more efficient as a result of training.
Diet (and specifically protein) supports this. It may be by producing
more muscle tissue, but equally it may be through producing more
mitochondria (energy cells) or new oxidative enzymes – to improve
aerobic capacity.
This
underlines the importance of protein intake after ALL types of
training, not just those deemed to “damage muscles” as
traditional dogma would dictate. The way and type of protein which is
synthesised depends on the nature of the training stimulus.
Recovery
Recovery
is of course a critical component of training. It's during recovery,
NOT TRAINING that our bodies become stronger and more efficient than
they were before.
Training (and racing) causes damage at the cellular level. Without
adequate protein, recovery from training will be impaired . This not
only limits subsequent training (and adaptation) but also increases
injury risk.
Above
all, we want to make sure we are supplying our bodies with enough
dietary protein to maximise muscle protein synthesis, and support
exercise adaptation and recovery.
To
achieve this, the rate of muscle protein synthesis (from amino acids)
must be elevated above baseline (and above the rate of muscle
breakdown). How much dietary protein do we need to achieve this?
Again,
we
need to look at amino acids. Studies have suggested that around
15g of essential amino acids are required to optimise muscle protein
synthesis. Critically however, not all amino acids are equal and it
seems that the amino acid Leucine has a more significant role to play.
It has been shown that Leucine stimulates a compound in muscle known as
mTOR or the rather wordy "Mammalian target of rapamycin" which is like a
molecular "switch" which drives muscle protein synthesis. 15g of essential amino acids
will typically yield around 3g of Leucine. So we need at least 3g of
Leucine – how can we get this?
Well,
30g of Whey protein powder would do the job (less if you choose to add extra Leucine), but if you are using a
food source you might need anything up to 40g if beef or fish was you
protein of choice.
So,
protein is doing it's thang – how long will this effect last? This
will also depend on the nature of the protein source. Science seems to
agree that protein synthesis will last around 2 hours following
ingestion of a (whey) protein supplement and maybe 3 hours following
food.
What's
interesting is that protein synthesis seems to stall beyond this time
frame, even if blood amino acids remain elevated. It can be said that
protein synthesis becomes “refractory” or no longer responsive to
elevated blood amino acid levels beyond a 2-3 hour period. A real
shot in the eye to anybody advising a “grazing” dietary approach
or one recommending protein intake should be spread out across many
small meals. (including the gym junkies who neck a protein shake
every 2 hours!)
A rat study by Wilson G, Layman D et al showed that once again Leucine had a role to play. Here it was found that Leucine supplimentation 2hrs after training (and initial protein intake) could extend the protein synthesis window or reactivate protein synthesis once it had become refractory to circulating blood amino acids. I am not aware that this study has been conducted in humans yet, so consider these results with caution.
A rat study by Wilson G, Layman D et al showed that once again Leucine had a role to play. Here it was found that Leucine supplimentation 2hrs after training (and initial protein intake) could extend the protein synthesis window or reactivate protein synthesis once it had become refractory to circulating blood amino acids. I am not aware that this study has been conducted in humans yet, so consider these results with caution.
Generally speaking though,
it seems a “reset” is required and blood amino levels should be
allowed to return to near base line levels before another bout of
protein synthesis can be initiated with a protein feed.
Contrary
to nutritional dogma then, it would seem our protein intake is better
coming from 4-6 larger protein doses with 4 to 5 hours in between
rather than lots of smaller doses with snacks and shakes etc.
This
notion is supported by a great deal of research looking at both
intermittent fasting diets and uneven protein feeding diets.
The
study below had subjects eating ALL their daily food intake in one meal –
pretty extreme my modern standards. However, the subjects did not
become protein deficient (which they surely should have if we are to
believe the 30g protein per meal limit). They DID however become
leaner and had lower cortisol levels (the bodies stress hormone)
A controlled trial of reduced meal frequency without caloricrestriction in healthy normal-weight, middle-aged adults
This
next study looked at elderly ladies who consumed dietary protein either
split equally throughout all daily meals or taken as a large protein
feed during one of their main meals.
Protein
synthesis was significantly improved in the group consuming their
daily protein intake in a single meal.
Daily
protein intake was still within the “normally” advised range, but
the elderly subjects benefited from the single higher “dose”.
Whether
this benefit was due to the single feed or just the higher dose is
hard to say. Maybe the split feeding did not provide enough protein
to meal to optimise protein synthesis?
However,
we CAN say that higher protein doses are not just tolerated – they
are beneficial,
So
hopefully the nail is well and truly in the coffin of the “20-30g
protein per meal” dogma
Daily requirement remains hard to quantify though. I would view the generally publicised range of 0.8-2.0g per Kg body weight as a minimum but would suggest elevated levels could be optimum - or more beneficial from a health / body composition / performance stand point.
The
basic protein needs of a sedentary individual could probably be met
at the lower / mid point of this scale by consuming real foods containing
high quality protein (ideally animal based – sorry). But even this
group may benefit from increasing protein intake (more later).
Those
engaged in heavy training should definitely push intakes towards the
2g/kg level and will not experience negative health connotations
(providing the individual is in good general and renal health and
does not choose potentially damaging protein sources like soya).
Very
big males wanting to build significant size and strength could even
push beyond 2g/kg without ill effect.
But
do remember, just because you may not be “working out” regularly,
don't think you have no use for dietary protein. You do of course, as
this blog has hopefully made clear by highlighting the many roles
protein plays beyond simply “muscle building”.
Indeed,
there may be another reason to increase protein intake amongst
sedentary individuals
That
being “Satiety” – or satisfying hunger.
Anecdotally,
higher protein diets have been shown to satisfy hunger but the
mechanism has been largely unexplained.
However, recent research has shown that satiety and food intake is modulated (in part) through special
receptors (known as mu-opioid receptors or MORs) on nerves found in
the walls of the portal vein.
The
portal vein drains blood from the gut. So, stimulating these
receptors enhances food intake, blocking them suppresses intake.
And
what do we think protein does?
Yup
– you guessed it. Protein, or more precisely peptides, (the
products of digested dietary protein) block MORs, blunting appetite.
These peptides then send signals to the brain which transmits signals
back to the gut to stimulate the intestine to release glucose. This
then suppresses the desire to eat.
Add
to that the fact that animal protein often comes with a good source
of healthy fats and you can start to see why a breakfast of bacon and
eggs will satisfy hunger far more effectively than a “real world”
serving of Special K! (And could be lower in calories as well!)
Another
reason to consider increasing your protein intake is if weight loss
or improved body composition is your goal.
A
great (recent) study here
showed that during a 12 month, calorie restricted diet, when protien
intake was increased from the accepted norm of 0.8 g/kg to 1.6 g/kg a
greater percentage of fat mass was lost and more muscle mass was
maintained.
Interestingly,
both high protein AND low protein groups did lose the same amount of
weight but the lower protein group lost more muscle (and less actual
fat) – not good.
This
illustrates the problem with many conventional weight loss regimes
which limit protein and fat in favour of carbohydrate (often poor
quality). These diets do often yield weight loss (mostly by extreme
calorie restriction) and people who follow them may even deem their
“diet” to have been a success. Until, that is, they try to
maintain this restrictive eating regime and realise it's just not
possible. When they do eventually “fall off the wagon” the lost
of precious muscle mass (and the preference for their bodies to burn
sugar and store fat) will mean the fat very quickly returns.
The
so called “yo-yo” diet ensues.
So
why does protein consumption cause this preferential (and more likely
permanent) weight loss? Well not only does dietary protein require
more energy to break down than carbohydrate (increased
thermogenisis), having more muscle mass increases your energy
requirement at rest (increases BMR) so you burn more calories doing
nothing!
Also,
lower protein intakes most often mean higher carbohydrate intake (to
obtain sufficient calories). Higher carbohydrate intakes
(particularly of the refined sugary types) keeps insulin elevated
which “locks in” fat as opposed to burning it as fuel. Higher
protein diets on the other hand typically have lower carbohydrate
percentages and higher fat percentages. Consuming fat does not
trigger insulin, so our bodies adapt to becoming efficient fat
burners.
So
if weight loss is your goal (even for athletes) it's far better to
keep good fats in the diet along with protein up to 1.5 – 2.0 g/kg
and introduce strength training into your regime. That way, lean
muscle mass will be maintained – even increased and you will become
a lean, fat burning machine!!
Oh,
an your food will taste good – which is a bonus!
Is
there a flip side?
It
would be remiss of me to extol the many virtues of protein intakes,
which may be higher than those deemed appropriate by many main stream
sources, without discussing any negative health issues.
Some
would warn of the potential damaging effects of too much protein as
this is said to place excessive stress on the kidneys.
Ok,
“stress”. It's an emotive word.
Dead-lifts
“stess” our back and other muscles, but this is what our back and
other muscles are designed to do – lift heavy shit!
It's
the same with our kidneys. Higher protein loads do “stress” our
kidneys – but it's what our kidneys are designed to do – handle
fluctuating protein loads.
It's
like advising people not to breathe too hard because it stresses the
lungs. Or think to hard because it stresses the brain!
Same
applies to kidney stones. Increasing protein intake will not increase
your risk. Again, it seems a pre-existing metabolic dysfunction is
required before dietary protein can increase risk of stone formation.
No,
in a healthy individual, with healthy, functioning kidneys, the idea
that higher protein intakes come with increased risk of kidney
disease is just not supported by the science.
Conversely,
the notion that higher protein intake DOES NOT increase health risks,
in healthy individual, IS supported by the science.
Dietary protein intake and renal function
High protein diets decrease total and abdominal fat and improve CVD risk profile
Bottom
line – healthy individuals need not be concerned.
So
with that, it's over to you all.
Consider
your age, size and training / weight loss goals. Consider that for
most of us, the lower end of the generally accepted range is too low
and there are significant benefits to increasing protein consumption.
Consider
splitting your (increased) daily protein intake across your 3 main
meals and your 1 – 2 post workout recovery supplements. If
anything, aim for 4-5 higher protein doses with more time in between,
as opposed to “grazing” or multiple feeds with lower single
protein doses.
Following
this regime (and incorporating heavy weight training into my routine)
I have been able to lose significant amounts of body fat and build
more lean muscle.
Ok, so I've never been a fatty exactly, but I'm
a stronger and leaner athlete in my 40's than I was in my 20's –
FACT.
But
I do now fall asleep on the sofa after training....
Eat well... train hard... rest harder!